Mobility Planet

Rupprecht Consult

#01 Regulating new mobility: Why is it so hard to do?

Where we should draw the line

2021-05-04 39 min

Description & Show Notes

This is the first in a series of four podcasts looking at various aspects of new mobility and how to regulate it.  
What are the main challenges from a policymaker’s perspective? How can the public sector ensure that regulations are flexible enough to take in new forms of mobility? How can a company whose business models depends on certain regulations future-proof themselves to potential changes?

This episode has been produced within the context of an EU-funded project called GECKO, which is looking at what it takes to effectively regulate new mobility solutions without stifling the creative ideas behind them. 
We’ve brought together three stakeholders from different backgrounds and perspectives to talk about some key challenges of regulating new mobility. 

We have Krysia Solheim, who works in the UK for the bike sharing company nextbike, a private sector company offering a comparatively new service. 

We have Eetu Pilli-Sihvola from the National Transport and Communications Agency of Finland, the public sector. 

And we have Doris Wiederwald from AustriaTech, a non-profit-organisation that accompanies innovation processes in mobility and advises the Austrian government on implementing national and European guidelines.

If you want to find out more about this podcast and our work, feel free to check the link section below. Please consider subscribing to our show if you want to hear more about the urban mobility of the future.

| Links  for this episode |
| Contributors |

Jingle: Santiago Campos
Visual: Marie Rupprecht, Alexander Büche
Speakers: Bonnie Fenton, Krysia Solheim, Eetu Pilli-Sihvola, Doris Wiederwald

| Disclaimer | 

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 824273. The sole responsibility for the content of this website lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the INEA nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.